Advantages and disadvantages of a juries and lay magistrates

The Magistrates will listen to evidence from the Prosecution and defence, including any witnesses, victims and the Defendant. Moreover there is an inconsistency in sentencing, so offenders in different areas are sentenced for different lengths of times for the same offence. The chairperson will tell the D the sentence and particularly if it is a prison sentence must state why the sentence was set at this level.

Lay magistrates are not legally qualified and do not get paid, where as stipendiary magistrates are legally qualified and get paid for there job. In conclusion there are many advantages and disadvantages of both magistrates and juries, which are that there is public confidence, fair results without being bias and juries represent the public as a whole, this means that they are a fundamental part of a democratic society.

Other disadvantages of having the jury service can be that they may be a case of racial bias. Also it is cheaper to send cases to lay magistrates than using professional judges because they are cheaper and do their work voluntarily.

The Magistrate will also instruct the P and D as to when the trial date will be and as to the witnesses that need to be summoned and other evidence required.

For triable either way tew offences such as theft are medium serious and require the Magistrates to under take a plea before venue hearing where the D states whether they plead guilty or not guilty.

Magistrates come from a ride range of backgrounds than professional judges and are much older then district judges. The advantages of having jury service are that the legal system becomes more open and justice is seen to be done as members of the public aim to get fair results and they are made without bias.

Appeals Appeals on sentence or conviction by the D from trials in the magistrates court are held in the Crown court with two Magistrates and a Crown Court judge. The Magistrates will get guidance from the Justices clerk on the road and then retire to discuss their verdict, which is a majority decision.

The jury services are free from pressure during discussions and are protected from outside influences when deciding on the verdict. Many magistrates are from a good gender balance; this can benefit them because they are able to understand males and females. The Magistrates will consider any previous offences and breaches of bail conditions before deciding whether the D can get conditional bail, such as reporting to the police station or must remain in prison until the trial, remand.

The advantages of having jury service are that the legal system becomes more open and justice is seen to be done as members of the public aim to get fair results and they are made without bias.

For the jury service there is public confidence and it is an open system of justice they are also considered to be a fundamental part of a democratic society.

Advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors

It also helps to keep the law clearer as points have to be explained to the jury, enabling the defendant to understand the case more easily. If the D pleads guilty and the Magistrates think the case is too serious for their sentencing powers they can send it to the crown Court who have greater powers.

Search Advantages and Disadvantages of Lay Magistrates In this essay I intend to evaluate the effectiveness of lay personnel and the advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors. Where the D pleads not guilty the Magistrates can decide to commit the D to the Crown Court for the trial if they believe the offence is too serious or complex from the evidence given at the mode of trial hearing.

On the other hand the disadvantage of magistrates is that there is a lot of media influence and there is also racial bias. They are not as good as cross section, as most magistrates are often perceived as being middle-aged and middle-class.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Lay Magistrates

Also it is cheaper to send cases to lay magistrates than using professional judges because they are cheaper and do their work voluntarily.

For the jury service there is public confidence and it is an open system of justice they are also considered to be a fundamental part of a democratic society. Magistrates come from a ride range of backgrounds than professional judges and are much older then district judges. For most sentences the Magistrates will ask the probation service to prepare a report and then take the social and community ties background of the D into account when setting the sentence.

Trials 3 Magistrates deal with all summary trials and any tew trials where the D decides to have trial in the Magistrates court. Advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors Advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors 7 July Law In this essay I intend to evaluate the effectiveness of lay personnel and the advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors.

It also helps to keep the law clearer as points have to be explained to the jury, enabling the defendant to understand the case more easily.

Also they prosecute biased, as they believe the police too soon; there fore they could be sentencing someone innocent. On the other hand the disadvantage of magistrates is that there is a lot of media influence and there is also racial bias. The whole case is heard in full again and sentence or conviction re assessed.Study Flashcards On Advantages & Disadvantages of Lay Magistrates at ultimedescente.com Quickly memorize the terms, phrases and much more.

ultimedescente.com makes it easy to get the grade you want! Advantages and Disadvantages of Juries ; Advantages and Disadvantages of Arbit Advantages and disadvantages of SV. Lay magistrates are not legally qualified and do not get paid, where as stipendiary magistrates are legally qualified and get paid for there job.

The advantages of having jury service are that the legal system becomes more open and justice is seen to be done as members of the public aim to get fair results and they are made without bias.

Lay Magistrates - Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Local knowledge of the area in which they serve, thus making it easier to hear evidence as they know the surroundings Paul v DPP: whether or not a kerb-crawler was likely to be a nuisance to the neighborhood.

In this essay I intend to evaluate the effectiveness of lay personnel and the advantages and the disadvantages of magistrates and jurors. Lay members (Magistrates) have legal advisers within points of law and live locally as they have to live close so that they know the area well.

Also it. Start studying Lay people advantages and disadvantages. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Magistrates and Juries. Advantages and Disadvantages of Magistrates in the Criminal Justice System. Advantages. The Public has confidence in a trial by peers.

Discuss the advantages of using lay magistrates in the criminal justice system (10).

Download
Advantages and disadvantages of a juries and lay magistrates
Rated 3/5 based on 72 review